The impact of reducing or eliminating federal funding for certain public radio stations

40 years of npr
Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo.

Image via Wikipedia

Some individuals may not realize the fact that there is federal funding available for public radio stations.  Those in the business are aware of these resources, but these resources may be eliminated in the future.  We as a country have come to expect and enjoy the benefits of public radio as it is today.  This however may be changing if current legislation in Congress is enacted into law.  Today, part of the financial support for public radio stations is provided through federal funding.  Typically it is not a large percentage but it would have an impact if funding were either eliminated or reduced.  This would not only impact jobs on radio stations but the availability of certain public radio stations.

The target of the current legislation which is HR 68 and HR 69 and Senate Bill S492 would impact non-commercial radio stations.  Non-commercial radio stations are those that are owned or operated by a municipality and which transmit only noncommercial programs for educational purposes. These stations are owned and operated by public agencies or private nonprofit foundations, corporations, or associations.

Under current legislation being proposed, federal funding for the type of radio stations identified in the previous paragraph would be prohibited.  The types of federal funds identified in HR 69 include grants, loans, property, cooperative agreements or direct appropriations.  Embedded in the body of HR 69 is a provision to transfer the funds saved to an account for reducing the public debt.

Based on the legislation, funding for public radio is not going to be discontinued but reduced or eliminated strictly for noncommercial radio stations as defined earlier.  Granted the federal government needs to look at evaluating activities where government tax dollars are involved, but historically there is a distinct reason why government funding is involved in public radio.

Funds are provided to public radio stations through the corporation for public broadcasting.  One of the objectives of this organization is to make sure there is objectivity and balance in all programs.  This requirement is stipulated in the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967.  Eliminating the funding for noncommercial radio stations may have an impact on this requirement.  Cutting federal funding for noncommercial radio stations will not affect the funding for commercial radio stations.   The legislation currently written will prohibit the Corporation for Public Broadcasting from utilizing the funds for noncommercial radio stations only.

Funding restrictions for public radio should be implemented evenly across all types of programming options that are now available.  Reducing funding for one segment is not being fair to noncommercial public radio stations.  The Corporation for public broadcasting was created to be private and free from government control.  The action of reducing funding however small will impact the types of programs that will be available in the future simply by the fact that funds are restricted for one segment of the radio community.

It is important that all types of public radio stations be available to have a balance in the content that the public has a right to choose.  It is understandable that anything funded by the government is going to be reviewed and evaluated given our current economic conditions, but one segment of society should not be treated any different than another, in this case the public radio community.  The objective of the language in the legislation is to reduce government cost and apply the savings to the national debt.  This is an admirable objective.   The bills cited in this article may become law, but before they do, they should be examined by all senators and representatives.

Public radio stations and the choices we make each day are important.  Changing the funding for public radio as now written cannot help to impact the principle of having balance programming choices available to the public.  The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is entrusted to make sure this principle is accomplished.  Restricting the use of funds for all types of public radio stations whether they are commercial or noncommercial prevents them from accomplishing their responsibilities.

It is hoped that the right decisions will be made before the legislation discussed in this article becomes final.  It is up to the public who reads this article and feels that funding for public radio stations should be provided evenly across all segments of the radio community to communicate with their elected senators and representatives.  It is not fully known whether these legislative acts will have a consensus between the Senate and House of Representatives, but this issue is something that will impact us all.  We need to voice our opinion on this issue and be involved in the workings of our government.  The more we are informed about an issue the more we are better in a position to impact the decisions made in Congress or at any government level.  Our elected officials should listen to those whom they represent but they also need to make the hard decisions that need to be made.  We may not always agree but we have a right to make our opinion known.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

About Dennis AuBuchon

I worked for 35 years and have always tried to help my coworkers and others. I always did the best that I could do with the responsibilities assigned to me. I have over 27 years experience in quality assurance and I am a certified quality auditor and have been since 1992. I have written a book titled Integrity: Do You Have It? 2nd edition. It defines integrity and discusses the characteristics. It then applies them to various segments of society such as the news, education and politics. It creates a common set of criteria to evaluate others and us for the existence of integrity. It brings the subject of integrity down to the individual level. My second book is What Makes a Good Audit? It focuses on the audit process from the auditor viewpoint and those being audited. Requirements discussed include both the commercial and government regulations in the audit process. The benefits of auditing from both the auditor and auditee are presented in individual chapters. I am also a registered expert on allexperts.com for the subject of Quality control, TQM and ISO and have been recommended for expert of the month several times and have received high ratings for my responses. I continue to write articles on focusing on integrity principles in a wide variety of topics. Some examples include political issues, sports, court decisions, health care, education, business management, government office responsibilities and authority and congressional legislation among others. I also write articles which focus on many issues in the news. My web site www.myqualitywriting.com is a resource to aid other writers to market their publications and writing in addition to being a resource for my books, articles and services.
This entry was posted in Feature Post, Politics, Rethink Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 8 + 2 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)
  • Loading
  • advertisement

  • advertisment

  • Tags